Looking at military medical cases from 2016 to 2021, miscarriages, cancer cases, pulmonary embolisms, and neurological cases spiked dramatically among military personnel in 2021 compared to previous years, according to figures reviewed in the Defense Medical Epidemiology Database.
The three military doctors, Samuel Sigoloff, Peter Chambers, and Theresa Long, have been public critics of the mandatory COVID-19 shots going back to the fall of 2021. Like other vaccine skeptics, including medical doctors, the three military physicians have also been ridiculed as wacky conspiracy theorists in the media, such as a Daily Beast story that describes a “bonkers” lawsuit to stop the Pentagon’s vaccine mandate.
To back up their warnings, however, the three vaccine skeptics said they reviewed DMED numbers that are technically the medical billing codes for diseases, injuries, and diagnoses. According to those codes, they said, a diagnosis for cancer jumped 300%, for example, and female infertility jumped 471%. Among other medical issues, miscarriages jumped 300% and even a diagnosis of Bell’s palsy jumped 291%.
Mat Staver, whose Liberty Counsel law firm is representing a vaccine-refusing U.S. Navy SEAL, tells American Family News the American public should be asking the obvious question: What has changed to make those medical numbers skyrocket?
“And the only difference that you can come up with,” he says, “is the introduction of the COVID shots, the first one coming off the market in the very middle of December 2020.”
According to the U.S. military, however, there is another explanation: outdated data.
The findings of the military doctors gained enough public attention to generate a fact-checking article at Politifact.com, which was responding to social media posts about the alarming DMED numbers. A spokesman from the Defense Healthy Agency told Politifact it had reviewed the DMED numbers and determined -- quite conveniently -- the medical coding from 2016-2020 was underreported and incorrect. So that gave the appearance, the spokesman said, of an increase in medical diagnoses.
DMED has now been taken offline, the spokesman told Politifact, to “identify and correct the root-cause of the data corruption.”
In an article at The Blaze about the DMED data, investigative journalist Daniel Horowitz told readers that data is closely watched by the Dept. of Defense in the name of national security. That is because, he said, the Pentagon knows medical injuries and illnesses harm its combat-ready status.
Horowitz quotes the website of the Armed Forces Health Surveillance Division, which states that is conducts "medical surveillance to protect those who serve our nation in uniform and allies who are critical to our national security interests.”
In his article, Horowitz was not responding to the fact-checking claim of outdated medical coding. The Blaze published Horowitz's story Jan. 26, two days before the Politifact story published claiming the DMED medical data had not been updated going back five years.
'Our soldiers are being injured'
The alarming findings from the DMED was cited publicly Jan. 26 when an attorney, Thomas Renz, testified at a Capitol Hill hearing. The hearing, led by U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wisconsin), included five hours of testimony from prominent vaccine opponents, including from Dr. Theresa Long, a U.S. Army flight surgeon and lieutenant colonel.
According to a Washington Times story about Dr. Long’s testimony, she spoke at the hearing under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act because she has grounded vaccinated pilots for myocarditis, a heart condition the CDC has admitted is a side effect in COVID-19-vaccinated patients.
When it was Renz’s turn to testify, he said the three military doctors are brave whistleblowers who backed up their findings under a penalty of perjury.
“Our soldiers are being injured, experimented on, and sometimes possibly killed,” Renz, who who represents non-jabbed soldiers, said at the hearing.
Like the medical doctors, Sen. Johnson has been discredited as wacky and dangerous, too, for publicly questioning The Jab such as an MSNBC story that accused him of playing politics with the issue. That story predictably ridiculed Johnson for his views but tellingly failed to mention the headline-making hearing that was held two days before the story published.
According to Staver, the adverse affects from the experimental vaccine are being ignored because Big Pharma is cooperating with its allies at the FDA and at the CDC.
"And look at what they're making," he says. "They're making billions and billions of dollars off of these experimental shots.
